Writing A Case: Case Structure

A Public Forum case consists of four parts: Introduction, Framework, Contentions, and Conclusion.

The Introduction

An Introduction identifies the resolution, identifies the side (“Pro” / “Con”), and presents a thesis that previews the arguments of the Constructive.

Reading the resolution helps the judge know what the topic is!
Identifying your side (“Pro” / “Con”) tells the judge what position your team will take.
A clear thesis previews your contentions.

An Introduction should take no more than 15 – 20 seconds.

Framework

Framework tells the judge how to evaluate the arguments in the debate.

Framework often refers to the wording of the resolution.
Common Frameworks include:
- Cost-benefit analysis: The judge should weigh the costs and benefits of the topic.
- Utilitarianism: The judge should prioritize the greatest good for the greatest number.
- Human Rights: The judge has a moral obligation to uphold human dignity.
- National Security: The judge should prioritize the national security of the United States.
  - This is common on topics of government policy.

Framework should take no more than 15 – 20 seconds. Framework arguments will develop during the debate.

Contentions

Contentions are arguments for or against the resolution. Most cases have 2 – 3 contentions.

A Contention is structured like a paragraph. It includes:
- A topic sentence identifying the argument.
- Research / evidence proving the argument is true.
- A concluding statement restating the argument or explaining why it’s important (the impact).
Contentions should take up MOST of the speech.

Conclusion

The Conclusion summarizes your contentions, restates your thesis, and urges the judge to vote for your side.

Summarizing your contentions helps the judge identify your arguments
Restating your thesis crystallizes your position.
Urging the judge to vote for your side is a no-brainer. It’s why they’re there!
A Conclusion should be no more than 15 – 20 seconds. It’s very short.

pf home