Baker, William. “Reflections on the New York Urban Debate League and Ideafest II.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 69-71.
—
Bauschard, Stefan. “Coaching to Cooperate: Team Debate as a Cooperative Learning Method.” The Forensic Educator 15, no. 1 (2000-2001): 7-21.
—
Bellon, Joe. “A Research-Based Justification for Debate Across the Curriculum.” Argumentation and Advocacy 36, no. 3 (winter 2000): 161-75.
—
Branham, Robert J. “’I Was Gone on Debating’: Malcolm X’s Prison Debates and Public Confrontations.” Argumentation and Advocacy 31 (Winter 1995): 117-37.
—
Breger, Beth. “Building Open Societies Through Debate.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 66-69.
—
Breger, Beth. “Overview of the Urban Debate Program.” Rostrum 75, no. 4 (December 2000): 14.
—
Broda-Bahm, Kenneth, ed. Perspectives in Controversy: Selected Essays from Contemporary Argumentation.New York: International Debate Education Association (2002).
—
Broda-Bahm, Kenneth, ed. “Voices from the Ideafest: The Open Society Institute and Urban Debate in the U.S.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 58-9.
—
Bruschke, Jon. “From A League of Their Own.” Rostrum 75, no.8, (April 2001): 34-5.
—
Colbert, Kent R. “The Effects of Debate Participation on Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggression.” Communication Education. 42 (1993): 206-214.
—
Crenshaw, Carrie. “Sharing the Gift of Debate: Notes from the Tuscaloosa Debate League.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 80-84.
—
Crenshaw, Carrie and Edward Lee. “Speaking Truth to Power: The Revolutionary Potential of Competitive Academic Debate.” Controversia, 2, no. 1 (Spring 2003): 107-109.
—
Crenshaw, Carrie and Enslen Lamberth. “The Tuscaloosa Debate League: An Inclusive and Diversified Program for the Future of Policy Debate.” In Proceedings of the 2001ALTA Argumentation Conference, edited by. G. Thomas Goodnight et. al. Annandale, VA: SCA, 2001. (forthcoming).
—
Duty, Mary. “Paving The Way.” Rostrum 75, no. 10, (June, 2001): 38-40.
—
Farrand, Brent. “Urban Debate Leagues and the Role of Classroom Teachers in Guiding High School Debating.” Rostrum 75, no. 4, (December 2000): 15-16.
—
Hoover, Eric. “Resolved: Change Happens.” The Chronicle of Higher Education 49, no. 46, (July 25, 2003): A28-9.
—
Huber, Greg, and A. Plantageonette. “Speaking Out: Tapping Potential in Urban Public Schools.” Cross Streets: Ideas for Cities and Citizens 1, no. 1 (Spring 1993): 29-36.
—
Lee, Edward. “Memoir of a Former Urban Debate League Participant.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 93-6.
—
Lynn, Les. “Debating Funding, Funding Debating: The Chicago Debate Commission’s Tale of Two Cities.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 72-75.
—
Massey, Michelin. “The Role and Necessity of Equal Education and Competitive Debate In Post Capitalist/ Industrialist Society.” Rostrum 74, no. 3 (November 1999): 24-6.
—
Mitchell, Gordon R. “Pedagogical Possibilities for Argumentative Agency in Academic
Debate.” Argumentation and Advocacy. 35 (1998): 41-60.
—
Moss, Larry E., “Beyond ans Expansion of Privilege: New Urban Voices and Community Advocacy.” Rostrum 75, no. 7 (March, 2001): 16-17.
—
Snider, Alfred C. “Ideafest II: The Urban Debate Movement Comes of Age.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 89-92.
—
Snider, Alfred C. and Schnurer, Maxwell. Many Sides: Debate Across the Curriculum, April 2002, Central European University Press.
—
Tucker, Eric and Phipps, Kelly. “Advocacy Tool Kit: How to Institutionalize a Debate Class in Your School.” Rostrum, Vol. 76. No. 9. May 2002. 17-21
—
“Urban Debate Coaches.” Rostrum, Vol. 76, No. 8. April 2002. 33-34.
—
Von Dras, Dean D, Ph.D. “Developing Students’ Self Agency: Focusing on the Psychology of Learning in the Education Reform Debate.” Debate Issues 33, no. 4 (February 2000): 12-16.
—
Wade, Melissa Maxcy. “The Case for Urban Debate Leagues.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 60-65.
—
“Urban Debate Leagues and Educational Reform.” The Forensics Educator. Fall 1999, Vol. 14, #1
—
Wade, Melissa, Edmonds, Michael, Rorie, Vera, and Huber, Greg. “A Diversity Sensitivity Training Program for the National Forensic League.” National Forensic League Journal 5 (1995): 3-15.
—
Warner, Ede. “On Preserving Identity, Debate, and Finding Home.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 76-9.
—
Warner, Ede, and Bruschke, Jon, “‘Gone on Debating:’ Competitive Academic Debate as a Tool of Empowerment.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 22 (2001): 1-21.
—
Ziegelmueller, George W. “The Detroit Experience.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 19 (1998): 85-88.