Being Affirmative: (Wo)man with a Plan!

Learning Objectives

  • Introduce parts of an Affirmative (HIPS/SHIP).

  • Deliver speech from prepared notes.

Time Needed

~20-25 min.

Resources & Materials

  • Paper (2-3 sheets per student)

  • Pencil/pen (1 per student)

Teacher Preparation

  • Review parts of an affirmative (HIPS/SHIP), per the AUDL curriculum and video resources.

Lesson Outline

  • (Wo)man With A Plan! (Activity)
    • To begin, divide the squad into small groups (no more than three students). Each group will need to deliver a short (1-2 minute) speech, so plan group size accordingly.
    • Ask each group to brainstorm 2-3 pet peeves that “grind the gears” of each member.
      • When each group is finished, write down the “best” topics on the board for groups to select from.
        • The “best” topics will isolate a specific problem that can be solved by a specific action from a particular actor.
          • Example: What grinds my gears is the terrible food in the cafeteria.
          • The above example contains a distinct problem and can be solved (potentially) with an action from a specific actor (the school district).
    • Once you have a list of quality topics on the board, ask each group to select a topic.
    • Give each group time (no more than five minutes) to prepare a “solution” to each problem.
      • Once each group is finished, ask a representative from each group to present its solution to the squad.
      • Flow each group’s proposal on the board. After each proposal, offer brief feedback. Common errors include:
        • No specific actor.
        • No specific action.
        • Action does not specifically relate to the problem. The plan should answer the question of “Why?” this problem is occurring.
          • Example: Cafeteria food is terrible because of a lack of funding. Therefore, the plan should increase funding for the school cafeteria.
        • Problem is not fully explained.
  • (Wo)man With A Plan! (Reflection)
    • After each group has presented, lead a discussion in which you introduce the parts of an Affirmative (HIPS). Reference the strengths and weaknesses of the specific proposals created by your squad.
      • Example: This plan has a great solvency explanation but doesn’t explain the harms.

Points of Improvement

  • Plans do not have a specific solvency mechanism, or a specific actor.

  • Plans amount to “end X bad thing,” with no explanation as to how that occurs.

Signs of Mastery

  • Plans have a specific harms explanation, which matches up with a specific solvency mechanism.

Instructor Notes

  • This activity is best suited for less experienced students.

  • For large groups, only provide feedback on the “best” and “worst” plans to save time.

Next Lesson Plan: What Should We Do?